phase-1: scaffold platform foundation structure and architecture governance
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
||||
# ADR-009: Feature Flags and Capability Guards
|
||||
|
||||
Status: Accepted
|
||||
Date: 2026-07-03
|
||||
|
||||
## Context
|
||||
|
||||
Platform tenants have optional capabilities. Features cannot be assumed always present.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
Introduce capability model backed by bootstrap feature flags:
|
||||
|
||||
- FeatureFlagService exposes tenant capabilities.
|
||||
- Routes, widgets, and actions are guarded by capability checks.
|
||||
- Missing capability must degrade gracefully with fallback behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
Positive:
|
||||
|
||||
- One runtime supports variable tenant feature sets.
|
||||
- Reduces tenant branching and dead code.
|
||||
|
||||
Negative:
|
||||
|
||||
- Requires explicit defaults and fallback UX.
|
||||
|
||||
## Compliance Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- Components and pages cannot assume optional feature availability.
|
||||
- Capability checks must be centralized, not scattered conditionals.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user