Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
sdarbinyan
f9e09b1757 docs(backend): harvest platform mechanisms into the contracts (Wave 2, FH-E.1-E.4)
Writes the 14 harvested mechanisms from FORK-ANALYSIS-2026-08-21.md into
the backend contracts. Each section is dated 2026-08-21 and tagged FH-*
so any wording traces back to why it is worded that way.

The through-line: several contracts stated correctness as behaviour
("the webhook must be idempotent"). Behaviour written as an if-statement
gets deleted by a refactor and the failure mode is a double charge. These
sections restate it as schema and mechanism.

PHASE-3  3.1 conditional-write reservation, 409 on zero rows, cart-wide
             rollback, 15 min TTL
         3.2 InventoryMovement append-only journal with resultingAvailable
         6   bulk import idempotent by SKU, rollback while unsold
         6a  digital code pools, revealed only when paid
PHASE-7  5   unique constraints for payment idempotency and webhook
             replay, insert-first handling, signature over raw body,
             24h poll as reconciliation not primary
TRACK-S  2.1 session model - 32 bytes stored as SHA-256 only, HttpOnly,
             one cookie per contour, Argon2id params, mandatory TOTP
         2.2 origin allowlist ahead of routing on every cookie mutation
         4.2 AES-256-GCM envelope for stored secrets, HMAC fingerprints
         8a  order manager as a separate contour, scoped by membership
             rows rather than by configuration
PHASE-9  5.1 revision immutability, version = max+1, pointer flipped
             in-transaction, operational state does not travel
         5.2 clone carry / no-carry list, inventory to zero
         5.3 signed read-only preview, non-GET 404s while previewing
         6   host normalization, verifiedAt required, cache invalidation
PHASE-10 3a  server re-runs the editor's validation, clamp-and-fallback
PHASE-2  3.1 order publicToken, snapshot completeness, never updated

FH-2.12 rejected on the merits: our marketplace lifecycle state machine
is richer than theirs, adopting it would be a downgrade. Recorded in the
TODO so it is not raised again.

Also adds BACKEND-HANDOFF.md sections 0 and 0a - nine falsifiable
invariants as a release gate, each cross-referenced to the contract that
specifies it, plus PR and release discipline. And ADR-0006 recording what
we take, what we reject, what we keep because ours is better, and the
organizational question it deliberately does not settle.

No implementation changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-21 11:12:05 +04:00
sdarbinyan
71da5a8d80 docs: partner provisioning API contract, routing context, Track P
Some checks failed
Architecture Governance / architecture (push) Has been cancelled
A partner integration request landed for programmatic merchant-hierarchy
management (Company/Project/Store/PaymentPoint). Built the answer generically:
partner-specific behaviour is a PartnerProfile config row, and no partner name
appears in any entity, field, endpoint or status value.

New:
- docs/backend/PARTNER-PROVISIONING-API-CONTRACT.md - hierarchy, idempotency,
  node-scoped public-key credentials, TEST/LIVE partition, routing context
- docs/context/adrs/ADR-0003-generic-partner-provisioning-api.md

Amended, because the schema impact must land before Phase 1 is implemented:
- Phase 1 gains RoutingContext on CheckoutSession/PaymentIntent/Payment,
  frozen at checkout-session creation and immutable after
- Phase 7 gains routing on Refund/ReconciliationRecord, plus the rule that
  seller settlement splits happen after routing, never as a hierarchy level
- Phase 9 gains Company/Project above Marketplace and PaymentPoint below it,
  with a backfill sequence for existing marketplaces
- Track S gains partner credentials: public key only, node-scoped authority,
  rotation with overlap, immediate revoke, audit coverage

Also: Track P (P1-P10) in the delivery plan, and backend ownership closed as
answered across the contract set.

Card payment was checked, not added - qr and card both already ship in
cart.component.ts with separate create paths and status pollers.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 11:22:24 +04:00
sdarbinyan
14c72d1a6a feat: extract auth into @marketplaces/auth package, add backoffice admin provisioning spec
- ADR-0001: decision to extract auth/payment into shared @marketplaces/* packages
- Scaffold packages/auth, packages/payment; @marketplaces/auth now holds the real
  telegram (customer+admin QR/session) and ed25519 (future admin challenge/response)
  auth implementation, pushed to sources.vitanova.network/sdarbinyan/vitanovaPackages
- Rewire ~30 call sites to import from @marketplaces/auth; delete migrated originals
  from core/auth, core/admin-auth, services/, models/
- Replace environment coupling with AUTH_API_URL/TELEGRAM_BOT_USERNAME injection
  tokens and isDevMode(); wired as file:packages/auth pending registry publish
- Add TRACK-S §8: bootstrap per-marketplace admin login + marketplace-scoped
  sub-admin invite/role endpoints
- Build, arch:check:boundaries, and full test suite (103/103) all green

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 01:05:16 +04:00
sdarbinyan
2e09369345 docs: Track A/S contracts + backend index tying the full v3.1 contract set together
Some checks failed
Architecture Governance / architecture (push) Has been cancelled
- Track A: analytics event pipeline (traffic/catalog/commerce/operational/
  quality events), synthetic-traffic separation enforced server-side by
  environment/token, never a client-settable flag.
- Track S: 17-role/3-scope RBAC enforcement, audit log, secrets, rate
  limiting, step-up auth - closes this session's most serious finding
  (admin role model is decorative today, any authenticated admin has
  full access regardless of assigned role).
- docs/backend/README.md: index of all 12 contract docs (Phases 1-10 +
  2 tracks) in build order, plus what's deliberately excluded (namespace
  migration, per-connector adapters, extra payment providers) and the
  one thing still genuinely open across all of them - backend ownership.
- Cross-linked from BACKEND-API-REFERENCE.md and the delivery plan so the
  index is discoverable from either entry point.

This closes out documentation for every phase/track in
PRODUCT-PLAN-v3.1-DELIVERY-PLAN.md that doesn't require a further business
decision. Nothing left undocumented on our side pending only implementation
and backend-ownership assignment.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-17 23:09:04 +04:00